The identity debates: Anonymity, pseudonymity, privacy.

I don’t believe this changes radically as we move to the social realm of interactions. Rightly or wrongly, people make “identifications” of nearly everyone in their surroundings. Some of these “identifications” are wrong, and some are right — but all are done. The bottom line of the real-world is that the human animal, at a subconscious level, *identifies* its surroundings (probably as a remnant of survival mechanisms). Anonymity — or the “state of being unacknowledged” — is a near impossibility in the “real-world.”

All of that nasty, real-world talk aside — the question now becomes: Should the online world reflect the real-world, or not?

Read Eric Norlin’s latest thoughts on the issue at ZDNet


Leave a comment

Filed under Anonymity, Privacy, The Politics of New Media, Virtual Communities

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s